Silence Means Consent

     The idea of silence and dominance is prominent in The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Hills Like White Elephants by Ernest Hemingway. The Yellow Wallpaper focuses on a woman’s inability to express herself against her husband’s wishes. Contrary to Gilman’s book, Hills Like White Elephants expresses a woman’s dominance over her significant other and a struggle to overcome the desire to stop all conversation. In everyday life, examples of this are clearly visible. When a celebrity acts against the standards set by society, it is most common to cover up the mistake or disguise it for something else. In the aspect of Lindsay Lohan this is true, but an interesting personality such as Charlie Sheen proves otherwise. These short stories and the lives of celebrities provide excellent insight telling why “Silence means Consent.”


     The female character in Hills Like White Elephants holds the very important position throughout the progression of the story. This dominance is effective in creating a distance between the couple. Multiple times, the irritated girl asks for the conversation to stop or even refuses to reply to the impatient boy. At line 45, Jig appears unfocused or unconcerned with the repeated assurance being expressed to her. In doing so, her role fulfills the act of creating a silence while also acting as the one being silenced. Holding this position shows a dominance of conversation or lack there of. The feeble attempts of the boy cause the girl to push away more each time. As the antagonist, the stubborn male forces the girl to agree with his plans, possibly leading to an unfortunate end. Silence, in common use today, tells that a person agrees to what is being asked or told. By pushing the female to become non-responsive she becomes an object of the man and submits to his authority.
The Yellow Wallpaper expresses an immediate concern to gender expectations, but it also points out the importance of silencing ideas. The concept behind the woman’s imprisonment is to remove the urge to express the creativity she wishes to display. She must be wary of when another person is going to be nearby, especially John for which she writes, “There comes John, and I must put this away, -- he hates to have me write a word” (Gilman, Line 39). While her husband takes on the dominant role of expression, the suppressed ideas are forced away causing pain and sorrow. Unfortunately, much of the silence created is vehemently forced. “... for he sat up straight and looked at me with such a stern, reproachful look that I could not say another word.” (Gilman, Line 141) In obeying and keeping the silence, the demands of the husband are met despite her inner desire to rebel. In society today, the standards still hold true and those who hold the most power determine what comes to fruition.


     In both of these stories, one character holds the point of dominance while the other is being reigned over. Times of discussion are only filled with quarreling. Often times, as it so happens in these stories, the consent is never fulfilled internally. Both of the roles being governed find ways to trick the overpowering authority. When a person keeps the silence, they are expressing their consent and obedience. Regardless of the time period, a person who remains silent in response allows anyone to create opinions and false facts about the outcome. In recent events, we see two opposite examples of this occurring, Lindsay Lohan and Charlie Sheen. Both of these actors have earned wealth through their fame and careers. They differ in the reactions to the outrage of the public in response to their actions. Both of these instances are comparable to those included in the short stories.


     Lindsay Lohan has been in and out of rehab and provides a sharp depiction of harshly trying to keep the silence. Public view of her situation shows contempt for her actions and allow the assumption that she is an awful role-model. Her career now involves fighting for her dignity which she does not explicitly do. The opressor is the public which this actress is unable to overcome. Forced into silencing her opinion has enabled an open interpretation that contains falsehoods and misconceptions which are not easily discernable from the truth. By acting in a non-responsive way, Lindsay Lohan surrenders to the public.


     Contrary to the media’s view, Charlie Sheen has become more of a legend to a select group of people. After gaining the spotlight due to his recent convictions, videos and interviews are all over the internet and television. While it is absoutely correct that his pattern of living is unhealthy and immoral, his reaction to the media’s attention is interesting. It seems as though the thinking involved shows displays an uncaring manner, similar to that of the Jig in Hills Like White Elephants. Instead of requiring silence like the female, Sheen voices his dissent for public opinion. He points out as well the stupidity of it as well. The reknowned actor says, “BTW (by the way), two wars are in an endless state of sorrow. Egypt about burned to the ground, and all you people care about is my bulls**t..(It’s) pathetic” (www.sfgate.com). Despite constantly digging a deeper hole for himself, Charlie Sheen uses the publicity to express a valid and important point on our society.


     Silence proves to be most important in our society. Whoever calls the silence and forces other to abide by it holds a great wealth of power. When the silence is not met, false information is very clear and harsh truths are shown the light of day. In the examples of these stories and of ones in our lives today, silence is a large part of forcing a person’s consent. If it were not for women speaking out against this silence, opportunities provided currently would not be available in this crisis. We can see by the writing of Ernest Hemingway and Charlotte Perkins Gilman that, both past and present, silence means consent.





Works Cited:

The Norton Introduction to Literature. 10th ed. Ed. Alison Booth and Kelly J. Mays. New York: Norton, 2010. Print.
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. “The Yellow Wallpaper.” Booth and Mays. 354-365. Print.
Hemingway, Ernest. “Hills Like White Elephants.” Booth and Mays. 106-109. Print.

www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/dailydish/detail?entry_id=82375. San Francisco Chronicle, 03 Feb 2011. Web. 07 Mar 2011.

Entertainment In Sorrow

     Sophocles gave his audience Oedipus Rex and Antigone, among many others, through drama in order to capture the ideas of sorrow and mourning. Today, many ideas are disputed on the topic of Sophocles' characters. One notion that can not be denied is Antigone's embodiment of a tragic hero. Dealing with the specific conflict presented to us in this play, Antigone faces a conflict that splits her family into many parts. Her Uncle Creon, a strict Dictator, her sister Ismene, a fearful sister, and herself, a dedicated family member. Her eventual demise, though, is what defines her. Sophocles' script gives us insight into every detail as to why Antigone is considered a classical Greek tragic hero.


     The defining quality of a tragic hero is the poor judgment that is constantly displayed through action and dialogue. Antigone, a grieving sister, has one goal in mind, to give her brother a proper burial even if she must offer her life in the process. From the beginning, this tragic hero keeps a closed mind to the consequences that follow her deed. Despite her valid reasoning about how Creon had put to shame one of the brothers yet kept the other on a pedestal (line 26), the goal Antigone desires will result in more pain within the family. Her selfish ambitions leave Ismene to decide whether it is better to die or spend her life alone and in pain.


     As the story progresses, we learn that Antigone disregards her sister's concern and proceeds with the questionable deed. A sentry reports to Creon that the body of Polyneices is missing. (lines 268-271) It is already told to us that the punishment for removing his body is “death by stoning publicly” (lines 40-41). While the reader is aware that Antigone has buried the body of her brother, Creon is not. It seems as though Creon offers Antigone the opportunity to free herself of punishment when asking her “do you confess or deny what you have done?” (line 486) Antigone does not take the opportunity to lie about what she had done instead confesses whole-heartedly that the deed was hers (line 487). Not only does she ignore this hint but also admits to knowing the punishment for her crime “for it was public” (line492). In these lines, we see the determining characteristic of a tragic hero.


     Antigone takes pride in her actions, so much that she is willing to give her life for it. A flaw of this size as shown by the hero is certainly one that causes mixed feelings. Is it certain to consider her actions a flaw? Surely she was correct in her undertaking. Was this act warranted despite the consequences clearly stated by Creon as well as the effect on her sister's life? Surely this is not the case. Is it still accurate to call Antigone a hero or more aptly named a tragedy? The chorus provides an excellent analysis of this girl, “The savage spirit of a savage father shows itself in this girl. She does not know how to yield to trouble” (lines 515-517). While being a biased source, even a neutral observer can agree. At this point, a conclusion can be drawn telling that Antigone only seeks to find her own destruction and disprove her uncle's dedication to their family.


     During her questioning, Ismene appears and is asked to tell of her involvement. When she declares that she participated in the plot Antigone quickly refuses to allow her to claim she was involved (lines 589-592). What is shown here is a clear indicator that her flaw shines a light on her opinion on others. An opinion similar to hers, keen on denying others a share of the blame, can only be attributed to her stubbornness and pride. It is fair to say now that she is not a hero but moreover a prime example of the fall of a good willed person. A hero works to help others who are suffering and in need. If she refuses to let her sister die for the crime, she is allowing her to suffer for the rest of her life in agony.


     When we see Antigone at the beginning of the play, we look upon her as a rebel fighting for a cause, following in her brother's footsteps. It is not uncommon for a hero to fight for what is right and defend those who are suffering or being treated unfairly. In the case of Antigone, we do not see these traits. Instead, we recognize several immoral and corrupt actions surrounding her single moral. Needless to say, Antigone appears to the readers much less a hero towards the end of the play. Causing death to more than herself and sorrow to others, it is not ideal to give such a noble name to someone who wreaks much havoc on the path the achieve a goal. It is most logical to call Antigone and her story, a tragedy.





Works Cited:

Sophocles. Antigone. David Grene. The Norton Introduction to Literature. Peter Simon. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. Pages 1492 – 1523.